MRI Markers Drive Expert Consensus on First-Line High-Efficacy MS Therapy

News
Team of doctors using video projector during conference
Imaging markers of high disease activity appeared to be the main driver of expert consensus to recommend monoclonal high-efficacy therapy (HET) for treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The finding comes from a Delphi study conducted in France and published in the Journal of Neurology.
The study defined monoclonal HET as anti-CD20 and anti-α4-integrin antibodies. The authors noted a lack of consensus on which treatment-naive patients should receive HET as first-line therapy. They added that 2 large randomized trials of early HET initiation have yet to report results.
A panel of 31 neurologists rated 8 fictional clinical cases, plus variations in which a single patient characteristic was changed at a time, for a total of 108 statements. Ratings used a 5-point scale. Consensus required at least 80% of ratings at either the agreeing (4-5) or disagreeing (1-2) end of the scale, with a matching median score. All 31 experts responded to both rounds; the second round followed an online workshop. Consensus was reached for 89 of 108 statements (82.4%).
The factors that systematically led to consensus in favor of monoclonal HET were all imaging-based: a high brain lesion load (>20 lesions), 2 or more spinal cord lesions, 3 or more gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and 3 or more infratentorial lesions. Several other factors often, but not always, led to consensus: a moderate brain lesion load, an initial attack with clinically concerning symptoms, a single spinal cord lesion, 1 or 2 infratentorial lesions, a previous attack in the past 12 months, and cognitive impairment. Demographic and clinical history characteristics did not appear to lead experts to advise HET, although few cases involved non-Caucasian patients or comorbidities.
The authors cautioned that the cases were hypothetical and not representative of everyday practice. Changing one parameter at a time may not capture interactions between factors, and the scenarios did not explicitly address treatment safety. The authors stated that their proposed framework should not be used as a clinical guideline.
Source: Bourre B, Guerrier O, Ayrignac X, et al. DELPHI expert consensus-derived factors influencing the early use of monoclonal high-efficacy therapies in treatment-naïve patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2026;273(11):679. doi:10.1007/s00415-026-14167-4
loading
Advertisement
×

Loading